By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
DonFerrari said:

They have inferred putting greener messages on the games. That can influence the type of game they choose to make or may make shoehorned decisions on including stuff in games not making sense.

Hell even oil company now go green, it doesn't mean they go green PS5 will be less powerful. Go green nowadays has become marketing tools , in fact none of it impact in real life.

Yes it is a marketing tool, but can have impact in the game development. Just look at Sony censorship to advocate for "womans right", or the changes in ND games, etc. Some stuff can be added to games and is good, others may be detrimental, and it isn't uncommon to make it wrong when you start shoehorning.

Echo_Djinn said:

I bet any amount of money that the internal PS5 components just happened to consume less electricity, and Sony marketing decided to spin that as "intentional" and that they're "going green".

Being corporate it is always a possibility. But considering it helps engineering it may also have been intentional.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."