SammyGiireal said:
How does a better console that is only 50 dollars more sell worst than the Wii U? Third parties were caught with their pants down with the Wii U. A Machine with with a worse CPU than the 7 year old 360. A system with similar architecture to the PS4 and Xbox One wouldn't have presented those problems. The Wii U was a mistake in its entirety, but the lack of power hurt it as did other factors that is one of my points. Nintendo hoped to pull off a similar trick with it, but the casuals that the Wii attracted weren't going to fall for a 350 dollar machine that most didn't know much about. The proof? Look at the numbers, 13 million units, a sharp drop from the 101 million units the Wii sold. The core and habitual gamers had made a shift to Sony and Microsoft. The Switch has made a nice push in getting that market back because of portability and some awesome first party titles. But everyone that I know that owns a switch also owns a PS4. The Switch is really a successor to the 3DS as most people I knew that had a 3DS also owned a 360 or a PS3 in those days. The Wii U failed to grab those gamers back. |
How does a better console that is only 50 dollars more sell worst than the Wii U?
The same way the Vita sold worse than the 3DS despite being $250, when the 3DS was $250, and $200, when the 3DS XL was $200. That's what happens when a system has no games.
Third parties were caught with their pants down with the Wii U. A Machine with with a worse CPU than the 7 year old 360. A system with similar architecture to the PS4 and Xbox One wouldn't have presented those problems.
The problem there is assuming that our hypothetical powerful Wii U would have gone with a similar architecture to the PS4. It wouldn't have, because it would have launched a year earlier, and Nintendo never does what everybody else does.
Also, Wii U was capable of 3 instructions per clock, and had 2 GB of ram. 360 was 2 instructions per clock and 512 MB of ram. Wii U didn't need such a fast CPU because it wasn't constantly grabbing info from the HDD like the 360 was.
I agree with the rest of your post, except for the following part...
But everyone that I know that owns a switch also owns a PS4.
Everyone I knew that owned a Wii also owned a 360 or a PS3. So Switch should be considered the successor to the Wii then right?