padib said:
It doesn't work that way SammyGiireal. The point I was challenging is that the Wii U failed due to lack of processing power. I gave you a counter-example: the handhelds. To defend your point, you need to defend the point, not bring up one that is irrelevant. I'll clarify: Step 1) One of your points/ideas: Nintendo Wii U was not powerful enough and so did not attract 3rd party support. Step 2) My challenge: That is not true because Nintendo succeeded on a weak, handheld line. Step 3 - Pass) Your answer: [Must contain logic pertaining to the point I mentioned]. Step 3 - Fail) Your answer: [Contains logic pertaining to a point I didn't mention regarding a good first party launch title]. |
My point remains valid, the Wii U failed as a home console in part because it was released in 2012 with out dated hardware. At 300-350 dollars no one in their right mind was going to support the system knowing that the PS4 and Xbox One were around the corner. It is a valid point when even Metro's developer stated they wouldnt make ports for it because the CPU was terrible.
Power isn't the only reason the Wii U failed but it is one of the reasons it did. That is one of my points. It proved true.