By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 22 August 2019
Edit Thread
Barkley said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

Splatoon also surely cost a lot less to make and is still full price. Meanwhile HZD has been dirt cheap for the Complete Edition for awhile now and even GoW retails for half price nowadays. 

Yes it's definitely true. Nintendo games make a lot more revenue even though Sony is somewhat rivaling them on sheer numbers now. Still it's great to have at least two companies having massive success with their first party games both critically and commercially.

Nintendo is the only publisher that doesn't cut their prices, and while that's great for business it's annoying as a customer.

I like how people brag and even think it is good for them that Nintendo don't do price cuts on older games.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."