By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:
Well seems like a lot of users were wrong on the thread of Halo on Switch.

No, people were arguing Halo on Switch SHOULD happen. Not that it will happen. Perhaps you didn't read the thread title.

This article is also being taken out of context. They're talking about the NEW games being created by their recently purchased studios. "As these new studios transitioned in, we were aware of some existing commitments to other platforms and will honor them. However, going forward these new studios will focus on making games for our platforms."

Maybe Switch support is over for MS, we don't know. But we can still discuss what we would like MS to put on Switch.

OP yes, he was saying it should. Some other were acting more like it will, and is already happening (like Ori) and would continue to happen.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."