Ganoncrotch said:
Disney knows how to use their corporate powers to churn out billion dollar movies, with the exception of the horrifically bad Solo movie I think they've been mostly rather successful in that, I think people might be saying it was silly of Sony to back out of the deal based on how lucrative it seems from looking at the 1.1billion which far from home made. But like I've said in an above post, Sony are well capable of making money from the Spiderman brand. Heck I've got 2 Phat PS3's which still sport the "spiderman" font. |
Sony wasn't backing down on anything.
They already had a deal, one that was valid and all. Disney wanted to pressure then to get more money out of it, Sony said no. So really the one going back on a deal is Disney not Sony.
People here are doing just like condoning to an abusive relationship. "But you are earning more now, just endure the beating of your husband" and the like.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







