DreadPirateRoberts said:
The biggest complication I've found with this thread is how aggressive Nintendo has been as a publisher. It's impossible not to be arbitrary at times, but as a rule, I try to look at the nature of the developer, the nature of the relationship with Nintendo, and the IP's history. For the purposes of this thread, I am inclined to accept both as third party since they were made by Platinum Games and Marvelous, which are both fully independent developers. It's something we could re-assess if there's strong feelings about it here, or if it comes out that those studios were simply developing on contract for Nintendo. In other words, I currently see it as being more like Square Enix and Octopath Traveler rather than Koei Tecmo and Smash. |
Koei T helped develop Fire emblem, Bandai N does Smash help
The Democratic Nintendo fan....is that a paradox? I'm fond of one of the more conservative companies in the industry, but I vote Liberally and view myself that way 90% of the time?