By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
DonFerrari said:

And by diverting money to make games focused on Switch they have a worse ROI than what they are currently doing and that is good because?

Why are you assuming that they will have bad ROI . We are talking specifict games that made for Nintendo not hardcore games that came out on PC/PS4 and Xbox One. Even Ubisoft are smarter by making dance games and casual games for Switch. During the Wii era EA are making specific games for Wii.

I'm assuming they aren't dumb, they run a big company and do business plan to make decision. If the BP they done for making a game specific to Switch returns less profit than what they are already doing they won't change. And since they aren't changing I assume that was their conclusion, and their PR basically confirms it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."