| Barkley said: Yes, Nintendo first party is still much stronger than PlayStation, especially when revenue is taken into account. Yet the improvement PlayStation has made this generation is remarkable, possibly unrivaled. A first party PlayStation game selling 10m+ was mostly unheard of, yet this generation will end with at least 6. |
Unfortunatelly VGC numbers are unreliable to do a TOP 10 and TOP 50 comparison for PS4.
But on PS3 we have TOP 10 average 5.83, TOP 50 2.5 and that gives us 1 10M+, 6 5M+ and 38 Million Sellers. It isn't that bad but you can see that Sony focused more and releases less titles but each selling more and having higher score. During PS3 time we had Shu saying that from every 10 games released they would lose money on 6, break even on 2 and only the remaining 2 would really profit and cover for the other loses. They truly had to forsake profit during the whole gen to prepare for this one.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







