By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
DonFerrari said:

There is no production of consoles that is shipped without a store requesting.

On the contrary, that is not how it works. Consoles are manufactured in numbers that would eventually meet customer demands (customers in that sense are distributors/stores). So in this specific case, 3.2M PS4 consoles were manufactured last quarter, and shipped (in the very sense of the word) to various continents. Some of those consoles were already sold when they boarded the ships, some were not. Since the consoles spend around 12-14 weeks on the ships (for the faraway continents), there is ample time to sell those unsold consoles. This the key and the crux of the business, predict the right amount of worldwide orders a year ahead of actual delivery time. To avoid that too many (or any at all) consoles leave the ships unsold, as this would mean you the manufacturer would have to stock them (and pay for it). Also worldwide shipping means shipping the correct amounts to every destination, you don't want one region overshipped and another region undershipped, leading to more problems and costs essentially. Sony has a pretty impressive track record for manufacturing (=predicting order numbers) the right amounts of consoles over the years.

You gave the explanation to agreeing that there isn't really overship/undership. Many in VGC believe that console manufacturers force stores to accept the consoles so they can have overshipping to look good on the books. Problem is that they state the revenue (which needs to be sold, can't be just manufactured), and on real world any excess or lack of shipping will be a very small percentage instead of an entire quarter worth of shipment. So yes, you could have some few hundred Ks that is moving on the ship still unsold, but you won't realistically have 1M+ on the warehouses over the world that then you need to reduce 1M of the forecast.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."