By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
thismeintiel said:

You're coming up with convoluted explanations to justify your bias. You say you have none, yet show it so clearly. If you are trying to come up with an average for ALL consoles sold, you need to include ALL consoles sold. You did it for Xbox and PS, to remain truly unbiased, the same must be done for Nintendo. You can't subtract the VB from Nintendo because it performed the worst out of all consoles counted because it drops Nintendo's average.

What difference does it really make? The ranking does not change whether the VB is included or not.

If Barkley had something against Sony, he would point out that one low-selling console was enough for Sony to call it quits while both Nintendo and Microsoft continued their efforts in spite of failure(s).

To be fair, the numbers change. That that rankings don't change is irrelevant. Without going back to look, I think this this was all about averages. I don't think thismeintiel ever thought anything but the averages would be different. Virtual Boy wasn't vaporware. It was a legitimate product, and it should be included in Nintendo's aggregate.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."