Barkley said:
And as I already explained:
Vita is 17.8% of the average, while Virtual Boy is just 1.23% of the average, making the Virtual Boy over 14 times more anomalous than the Vita. You have to draw the line somewhere, and I draw the line at 80x less than average, not 5.6x less than average. |
You're coming up with convoluted explanations to justify your bias. You say you have none, yet show it so clearly. If you are trying to come up with an average for ALL consoles sold, you need to include ALL consoles sold. You did it for Xbox and PS, to remain truly unbiased, the same must be done for Nintendo. You can't subtract the VB from Nintendo because it performed the worst out of all consoles counted because it drops Nintendo's average.







