Barkley said:
PlayStation average of 90.6m is 5.6 times higher than the Vita sales of 16.13m Nintendo average (including VB) of 62.3m is 80 times higher than the Virtual Boy sales of 0.77m. You can call both anomaly's, but the difference in how big of an anomaly they are is ridiculous. 5.6* vs 80*. And why shouldn't I mix HH and Home Console, the point of my averages weren't just to evaluate Home Consoles, but all dedicated video game systems I deemed relevant. If you want to show just Home Consoles again, go ahead. |
Vita 16.13M is 74.47M away from the average
Virtua Boy 0.77M is 61.53M away from the average
We could conclude though is that even when Sony fails it doesn't fail as hard as Nintendo. With PSVita that is deemed a big failure outselling WiiU and Virtua Boy, and being closer to the sales of N64, GC, WiiU than to any other system Sony released.
About doing one with only consoles I done it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







