By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
The_Liquid_Laser said:
Nintendo as a studio. But if you remember these years (like I do), Sony was the winner. Nintendo was getting pummeled hard by Sony as a whole. Up until this point Nintendo was the undisputed king, and now it was losing its throne.

I wouldn't exactly put it like that. Sony was selling more consoles but Nintendo still held the best games and competed very well without losing money. Keep in mind the PS1 also had piracy on there side with many people buying PS1 systems just to chip them for burnt games. That was a major selling point especially when N64 games were around $89 price mark. I remember the hype from Crash which still failed to beat Mario 64 while Zelda OoT was considered the game of the generation. I haven't even brought in the Rare titles yet. N64 games are still recognised for today as revolutionising the industry.

Don't get me wrong, the PS1 was a good platform and offered great games, I still have one however because of the work around in chipping PS1s, that would have helped boost PS1 sales a lot. I don't know anyone who didn't chip there PS1. I am sure its very different around the world. 

The best selling console is the one with the best games.  Period.  That is true for every single generation.  Generation 5 is notable, because Nintendo had all of the advantages going into it.  It had a very strong brand and lots of experience making games.  It still got its ass kicked by the PS1.

Piracy might have been an issue in some parts of the world.  I can say that in NA it wasn't really a thing and PS1 still sold more.  PS1 simply had better games (and a lot more of them).