By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Azuren said:

You're "forced" to own a Nintendo console if you wish to legally play BotW, yes.

By that logic you were "forced" to buy a Switch if you wanted to play it on a platform that wasn't trash and had a future, and if you wanted to play it on the go. It compelled the purchase of Switch units in vast quantities, even attaining an attach rate of over 100%, by being so desirable that people bought a Switch just to play it. Therefore, by definition, it was a killer app. The fact it also got a Wii u release is ultimately irrelevant.

If you say so, doesn't change the fact that you didn't need to own a Switch to play the game. You can add all these qualifiers of "if you wanted to play it on a platform with a future", but you still didn't need to own a Switch to play it.

RolStoppable said:
Azuren said:

It's called fudging the vernacular, the second phrase is what I intended to convey. And I assume you're getting your words mixed up as well, now? Because I've said multiple times that BotW is a killer app. I just don't believe it is specifically a Switch killer app and instead believe it to be a Nintendo killer app.

I am not getting anything mixed up. The problem is that your argument is nonsensical and I just wanted to know if you intend to stick with it.

This case is closed for me.

Only nonsensical if you really want to defend BotW as a Switch killer app instead of a general Nintendo killer app. Good luck with that.

mZuzek said:
Chrkeller said:

Not that as much as you two are stuck in a semantics argument with no end in sight. But hey, my mistake. Please continue for another half dozen pages. :)

Yeah, only one guy was ever stuck here. It's case closed and it has been for some time.

Is "case closed" the new thing to say?



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames