By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
Mnementh said:

(1) But still the US wants to extradite him. So why?

(2) Wikileaks denied having their sources from Russia. There is no proof to the contrary. Even if Russia hacked Clintons email, it doesn't mean they are the source for Wikileaks. But that's all besides the point. The point here is: the emails were real and the public should know about their content, as it was of interest for the public. Next we need Trumps email.

He didn't hack any governmental computers and it is not even his government, as he isn't american.

Trump asks for the e-mails from Russia.  Wikileaks corroborates with Trump junior over said e-mails.

Yet you doubt the Russia to wikileaks connection?

And you are fine with getting the e-mails no matter the legality of it, or the affect it had on the election?

So are you basically just another "but her e-mails"?

"Trump asks for the e-mails from Russia."

you really believe that someone running for president would seriously make such a request at a public rally?

"And you are fine with getting the e-mails no matter the legality of it"

she's a public servant, meaning her job in that post is to serve the public

this is how the military and intelligence agencies have all this ridiculous power, because people like you for some unfathomable reason think they should have it

which obviously leads to situations like iraq since they don't feel like they have to be accountable to the public