By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Barkley said:
RolStoppable said:

Is your post supposed to be taken seriously? It comes across as a demand that the number of creatures should scale with the sales.

The amount of effort/work and budget should scale with sales. If a game that makes $20m in revenue can manage to have 240 high quality animated creatures than a game that makes $900m+ in revenue can manage much more. Pokemon has never appeared to have a large budget while being one of the biggest earners in gaming.

Not with sales but time, delaying the game with more or all pokemon would be a 'better' game but cost more time to do so.  At this point they should have said they will bring more or all on a later date it would probably have been a better effect because you can alteast forward to the pokemon being added.   This reminds me all of GT on PS3 that would have lesser cars and people were upset so they put the PS2 cars in the game with PS2 graphics and people were pissed.