By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:

You are crazy.

Imagine there was a Nintendo console with a dry release schedule at the start of a new year and Nintendo told you that the next interesting game you can look forward to is another Pikmin and that will come in August. Nintendo could have made a new game in a more popular IP, but the developers felt like making another Pikmin, so instead of a game that can push hardware and motivate other developers to make games for this Nintendo console, Nintendo opted to lead their console into demise because doing Pikmin is worth it.

If this was the Wii U days where Nintendo couldn't afford risk-taking with niche games, I would agree. But it's not, this is Switch-era Nintendo. A company that has a far more consistent release slate now that 95% of their developments are consolidated to just one platform, with a console that regularly breaks sales records, and has software sales so good, that even most of their niche games can regularly pull 1-2 million copies worldwide. They can afford to make ARMS and Pikmin in-house currently. Like I said, you're argument would've made sense during the GameCube or Wii U days, where Nintendo need to stop screwing around and put out something that's guaranteed to move consoles at a time when they're not selling. But the Switch and its mainstays are breaking sales records each year.

So you ask why Nintendo should make games that sell hardware. Because that has positive consequences all around. You've got a game that is desireable in and of itself, plus you get more developers make games for the console because the console sells well.

I repeat that I am not against Nintendo making new IPs. What I am against is that Nintendo's top developers waste their time on IPs that have already proven themselves to be unable to reach the numbers that a healthy console business needs.

Again, this argument would be sound for a console that's struggling to find an audience. But the Switch is already an established hit, there's not much of a need to mandate developers to try and make a system seller because the Switch already has plenty and sells consoles on its own as well.