xCloud reportedly bests Stadia in early latency tests at E3, 4 ms vs 21ms of added latency

[kirby007]

SvennoJ said:

kirby007 said:

It was a xb1x vs xb1s

Edit : i like how you dont want to see past your own viewpoint

Microsoft has built custom hardware for xCloud in its data centers, combining four Xbox One S consoles into single server blades.

No XBox One X hardware. Perhaps overclocked server blades to bleed off a few milli seconds but it's still not realistic given the actual transmission time is much higher combined with video compression and decoding. It's not just ping time, it actually has to send data which takes time as well. Ping just sends 32 bytes back and forth. If you need 30 mbps and you have 60 mbps connection, transmission per frame already takes 8.3 ms under perfect conditions, on top of the travel time. That's just from the start of transmission until all data for 1 frame has been received on a connection that's twice as fast as the requirement. It's BS.

4x xb1s=xb1x  so even if your technically right, i still count that as one for me... but listen if this all is such BS why are they working on it? And pouring more and more money in it? Right because it works. But you know what im going to agree with you and assume its BS, can only be pleasantly suprised that way