Bofferbrauer2 said:
No, otherwise NVidia would get crushed by AMD already. It does tell the theoretical peak performance, but that's rarely achieved in Gaming, and far from it on AMDs current chips. However, a console with 13-15TFlops in GCN performance was out of question from the get-go unless Navi would have become less consuming than Turing. And while Navi certainly bettered itself in that regard, it's still les powerful per watt then NVidias offerings. For the record, I calculated the theoretical TFlops for the 5700 and the 5700XT and reached pretty exactly 7.5 TFlops and 9 TFlops respectively in gaming speed, so I'm sure they choose those clock speeds exactly for that reason. And considering the power consumption of either card, I think the 5700 (non-XT) is pretty much what will fuel the next gen consoles in one way or another. |
Yep radeon 5700 is 36CU's. this is what going in PS5 clocked at 1,8ghz for 8,3 Teraflops and I think Microsofts Xbox anaconda will have the same CU's as Xbox one x, 44 of them but 4 disable, probably clocked at 1750mhz for 8,9 Teraflops. Both consoles will probably be very similiar.
Last edited by Trumpstyle - on 11 June 20196x master league achiever in starcraft2
Beaten Sigrun on God of war mode
Beaten DOOM ultra-nightmare with NO endless ammo-rune, 2x super shotgun and no decoys on ps4 pro.
1-0 against Grubby in Wc3 frozen throne ladder!!







