By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
collint0101 said:
jason1637 said:

Well none is saying they have to provide for the child. Just be a decent eneough human being to let them live.

That actually sounds terrible. Life is one thing but quality of life is another and fact of the matter is our society is unfortunately unwilling to put systems in place to better the lives of these children after they're born. Like I've said probably 3 other times before this I don't like abortion but unless we see a huge political push to guarantee a decent standard of living for these children I'm going to remain pro choice because often times the alternative is crime, poverty, overburdened foster care, ect. Pro life is only concerned about whether or not a child is born but I doubt anyone here can find a pro life group that's also pushing for parental guidance classes or increased maternity leave

So you're pro choice beacause you're worried about their quality of life? That's like saying we should end thir lifes because they are gonna be poor. Why not whipe out the homeless while you're at it?