Nintendo FY2018 results, Switch 34.74M, Software 187.52M

[DonFerrari]

curl-6 said:

DonFerrari said:

You don't need or have to say a point is illogical or that it lacks logic, as you also don't need to attack person but points.

Pointing what contradicts a point is enough, no need to classify the point of someone else. And again it wasn't only saying it lacked logic but then putting how you are baffled that someone would think like that. You may not admit it, but it sounds very condescending.

If you find me condescending, fair enough; you are entitled to that opinion.

But if an argument is logically deficient, I'm going to point it out as such. Arguments are not a protected species exempt from criticism.

Attacking an argument is totally fine, and you do that with another argument and data, without any need to classify the argument because that doesn't have any value in the end.

It is equivalent to me saying your argument is dumb thus you are wrong. That doesn't prove anything, while your reasoning of why the argument was wrong were much better.