curl-6 said:
If an argument lacks logical merit, that argument will be naturally be challenged and criticized. I didn't call anybody "dumb", I merely pointed out that a particular position is currently in contradiction to almost all of the available evidence, and hence voiced my confusion that so many would still hold such a position. Why they chose to do so is not for me to say, you'd have to ask them. |
You don't need or have to say a point is illogical or that it lacks logic, as you also don't need to attack person but points.
Pointing what contradicts a point is enough, no need to classify the point of someone else. And again it wasn't only saying it lacked logic but then putting how you are baffled that someone would think like that. You may not admit it, but it sounds very condescending.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







