By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 23 April 2019
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:

They would look different, sure. As well as Switch looks quite different than PS4 version.

You can use different techniques, less taxing and still come to a decent result.

But since a theoretical PS3 version would look worse than the Switch version, that ultimately doesn't change the fact that Hellblade on Switch is more graphically advanced than the PS3 games you claim look better than anything on Switch.

That would be true. Although to be sure I would have to compare Hellblade Switch to UC2 or TLOU side by side on same size TV.

But since Switch have more power than PS3 certainly it can put better graphics than it when used for it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."