Biggerboat1 said:
An estimate made within a forum thread isn't really sufficient evidence in my book... |
There won't be any official numbers to give you. The profits estimative comes more from similar earnings, but PSN alone costing less than whole of Nintendo. So if earning are close but costs are lower then profits are higher.
You may dispute if they are really higher, equal or lower. But the main factor remains that it is still very close.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







