Biggerboat1 said:
Eh, PSN will surely have to pay out massive amounts to game developers who's games are their primary product. This has all been discussed to death : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=239201&page=1 'Making' money, to me, means profit. You can have a big revenue but still make huge losses... |
So you think PSN cost more to Sony than making Switch (which margins would be close to zero) or development of games? Yes, sure thing. Margin on services is much higher than on HW.
And funny of you to send this link that basically proves the point (Daniel Ahmad would be much more trusted source for this than you) and you before acting as if this wasn't a real thing, and then just shifting to "past tense".
Looking at profits on Nintendo as a whole it have Operational Profit of 177,577 Million Yen for the closed fiscal year while Sony had over 250,000 Million Yen profit
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8966641
So seems like PSN still profits more than all of Nintendo. Thanks for your help to confirm.
Last edited by DonFerrari - on 18 April 2019
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







