By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust said:
curl-6 said:

Hellblade on Switch is technically much, much closer to the full fat version than RoTR 360. The former retains much of its PS4 standard rendering tech, the latter does not.

Bottom line PS3/360 could not handle the Switch version of Hellblade, and as such PS3/360 are not relevant to my original statement, which was simply that Hellblade shows graphical results unlike anything previously seen on the Switch, and thus future games on the system might also do so.

360 has 1/16th of current gen consoles RAM and less capable GPU than Switch...yet RoTR on it looks really, really good retaining most of artistic vision of its current gen counterparts.

But beside that, you're missing the point. Not once have I said that Switch is not more capable than PS360, because it is. What i said, and stand by it, is that Hellblade is not that demanding game, due to its extremely limited levels, and that it would be able to run on PS360...thus not making it THE showcase of some "untapped potential" that Switch might or might not have.

On this degree I would say Switch doesn't have a game that looks as good as UC2 or TLOU that run on PS3. But of course that is no evidence that PS3 is stronger than Switch.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."