CGI-Quality said:
The_Liquid_Laser said:
You will never please anyone. Instead they should be asking what is smart. PS4 was smart, even if people complain, they did the right thing. Obviously we can tell it has been doing well. PS3 was not smart. They lost a ton of money with that.
Everything said so far makes the PS5 sound powerful. To most people this sounds good, because they haven't announced the price yet. But anyone who thinks about it a little will know that high power means high price. This is why most people saying favorable things doesn't matter at all. People talked very favorably about the PS classic when it was first announced. Did those people actually buy the device? Nope. This favorable talk for PS5 will melt away if it turns into a high price tag, which is what it is looking like right now.
They are better off having people moan about playing it safe. I mean, is playing it safe a terrible strategy? "Sure Sony, you could go for guaranteed profits, but why not do something really risky instead?" Playing it safe is not really such a bad criticism for a piece of hardware.
|
The PS Classic actually had plenty of negative pre-release talk.Â
Regardless, until we know all there is to know, your claims of bad decisions and 'not looking too hot' are fluff.
|
Uhm...it doesn't take too much reasoning to conclude that high power leads to high price. That isn't fluff. That's common sense. Or do you think the PS5 sounds underpowered so far?
Also, just going by replies on this forum, initial impressions were extremely positive for the Playstation classic.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=237730&page=1
