curl-6 said:
Every man-hour spent on an ancient port is still a man-hour that could've made a new game out sooner and better. And regardless of whether you feel ripped off or not, if you paid $60 for a game that came out from 4-6 years ago, you were ripped off. There is a good reason why almost all games get cheaper after being out for a while. Nintendo are just extremely greedy and anti-consumer in this respect. Most other companies would price such games at $40, and rightly so. |
And like I have said already, those extra man hours would have led to a minimal difference.
I'll ask again and please actually answer this time. What would have been better for the Spring 2017 lineup, MK8D in April+ARMS in June or just ARMS in May? What would have been better for the H1 2019 lineup, NSMBU in Jan+Mario Maker in June or just Mario Maker in April?
And regardless of whether you feel like others are ripped off or not doesnt matter because individuals decide for themselves what is a fair price or a ripoff for a game. 15 million people and growing are not idiots for paying $60 for MK8D, in this case you are the idiot for thinking an incredibly high quality game isnt worth $60 because of the arbitrary reason that it previously released on a different console 3 years earlier.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.