By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Yeah but just because armies usually defend by destroying does not change the context of its use in Owens tweet,cause she specificaly mentioned the procreating we cannot make it mean anything different by taking that aspect away.

Other than that, Candice Owens is not the smartest when it comes to tweets and in general saying things that can be used against her.

I guess I just disagree with this notion that there's no way one can read it that she's advocating violence against muslims. You start talking about armies in the same breath as you talk about how shitty it would be if France were muslim majority and I think you can make a pretty easy connection. Again, I don't think the shooter is being genuine when he mentions Candice, but I also don't agree with the idea that she's never said anything problematic in these realms. 

She's an idiot, no argument there. 

First bolded:Oh alright yes but this lunatic could have pulled the same advocacy out of a childrens book so i do not think this is something valid to put the focus on and surely not when the motive for what he did suggested he wanted people to attack eachother for political differences.

Second bolded: A matter of perception i guess,i rather call it stupid.

Lets end this with agreeing on her being an idiot. :p