By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
d21lewis said:

His mom said that, during the 2003 trial, her son told her what Michael did but he still love him. He made her swear to be quiet. It's all in the doc. Safechuck thought it was love, not abuse. Even when Michael died, he still loved him.

And people are quick to forget that it was partly these guy's testimony on behalf of Michael that kept him out of prison in his other cases.

What kind of Mom, swear to a child that was molested by a grown ass man, not to reveal such a thing in a court of law.  That story in itself sounds off the charts crazy.  I cannot think of any parent caring if their child believes being molested by a grown ass man is OK.  Unless, MJ dropped some millions for them to keep quite that whole story doesn't hold up at all.

She said he bought them a house, too. After the 2003-2005 trial. Just like with the other documentary, "Abducted in Plain Sight", the alleged offender is dead. The parents are acting so innocent and naive (kinda like MJ) but they had to have some idea. They just gained from their child's suffering.

Again, let me reiterate that I'm a huge Michael Jackson fan. I don't think I will ever change--but I'm trying to stay open minded. A lot of people are like "Michael is Innocent and pure" while others are like "Michael is the devil". There truth is likely somewhere in the middle.



Twitter: @d21lewis