I'll say the same thing about this that I said about the Robot LABO. It doesn't look very fun. It comes across as another product kids will beg for, play with for a day, then go back to hitting each other with curtain rods.
That being said, maybe the actual software is incredible. I doubt it but it's possible.
zorg1000 said: There was no point. Curl said hes not a fan of having a screen strapped to his face and Conina replied that people wear helmets and goggles all the time as if that has anything to do with Curl's personal feelings about VR headsets or things strapped to his head in general. Why cant VR fans just accept that some people arent interested in VR? Literally every time I have seen someone say they dont like VR or that it doesnt appeal to them there is always someone questioning if they have ever used one and then goes on to list reasons why the person is wrong for not liking or being interested in VR. Conina's argument about helmets/goggles takes the cake for most irrelevant rebuttle I have ever seen on this site. |
Let me first say that I'm not a fan of VR. I haven't really tried it recently but as of now, it doesn't interest me. That being said, I can absolutely understand why people who like VR get sick and tired of anti-VR people saying companies need to stop investing in VR simply because they don't like it. That, to me, is far more annoying than VR fans defending something they enjoy. If it looked like the traditional market was being dumped as companies hop on the VR train then I could understand but that is obviously not happening.
You can't gloss over, "companies need to stop making this because I don't like it." That's not the same thing as, "I'm not interested in it." I don't even care about VR but that kind of attitude bugs me, too, when it's apparent than many people do like it.