Crackdown 3 Review Thread - MC: 60 OC: 62

[Mr Puggsly]

DonFerrari said: 

Mr Puggsly said:

In general I think the HLTB is fairly accurate when it comes to completing campaigns, but the numbers for completing everything is much more random especially in an open world game.

ok

Again, watch the video. If you can spend a bunch of time talking about Crackdown 3 then maybe you can find the time for that video. I'm thinking your concern is it doesn't fit your narrative.

Nope, my concern is you only accepting a single source among several reviews as the right one, because most of the others are bad. Just look back on the thread and you'll see me defending the review that gave it a 90.

Straw man, I didn't claim it was the best implementation of UE4. You're making assumptions because of the 60 score without actually knowing much.

The 1-10 review scale is broken in my opinion because 1-5 is varying levels of crap. While 6 is often the score for bad game with redeeming qualities. So 60/100 seems odd for a game that's actually fun, polished and works well. This is why fans are ignoring the reviews for this game.

1-5 is varying level that barely anyone scores on that. It's odd because you like the game and disagree with the critics.

The Digital Foundry video I'm suggesting you watch isn't a review though.

On Metacritic, plenty of games have scored in the 50s or lower. Crackdown 3 is probably the best game ever to score 60 on Metacritic.