By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
DonFerrari said:

So I'm not sure how you interpreted my post, because your reply although completely right and having merit doesn't seem to be replying to my point.

I was replying specifically to the: "versus how many Nintendo fans will admit Nintendo haven't been able to compete with Sony and MS on console market since N64? Lost twice, then on the last 3 gens releases consoles that go far to not directly compete with both?" part.

I don't see any consoles as a failure. But I digress. I wasn't necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with any of your points, just placing my own perspective upon it.

Don't worry Pema. Not being able to directly compete isn't same as system itself being a failure, even thought a different thread we were having people claiming PS3, N64 and GC were failures.

Also I understood your point and since you weren't disputing any of the points I made, but giving your opinion we can shake hands on agreeing N64 and GC were good systems with great games that some will hold dear to their heart for their whole life.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."