@sc9 Was it really that hard to tell I was joking, I mean, I liked Majoras Mask and I will say yes it's a great Zelda but come on! Clearly Hyrule and Termania (I believe) were two totally different places, Hyrule was more about Ganon and his arch on shaping the world for him only to be foiled by his rival in his ageless battle of good and evil.
Now heres the key difference, Majoras Mask dealt with Link saving the world that can't be saved, in fact he fails every time up to the last time when you finally defeat Majora, the world is filled with misery sure, and the characters most definetly feel much more 'real' that many 'deep' games to date, in fact you'd be hard pressed to find a game up to 2008 that could rival the depth of Majoras Mask but that's just what Nintendo was aiming for, which they didn't for OoT.
In more elaborate words: Majora's Mask is post apocolyptic adventure while OoT is to prevent the apocolypse.
You can argue that the moon hitting the planet would of been apocolyptic I'd agure that was simply the finale, the period on a world that already ended.
OoT was still a better Adventure game - but that's my opinion.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
