So you were kinda making a strawman?
Ironically I think you are interpreting stuff from my comment I didn't say. All I was saying is that both consoles are overdue for a cut. I didn't say kero said otherwise. I did however say it was an excuse, but thats mostly because it could be said about both of them. If its only said about one console it makes it sound like its doing great despite the constraints. When really both have the same constraint. It's called a clarification. Someone said something, I clarified something by adding onto it. Doesn't mean I was arguing against something someone didn't say, as if the y were arguing the exaxt opposite of what I said. Just adding to what was already said.
I understand both view points that's why I originally responded to you. Because I was kind of confused at first. Like when you said it was an excuse when it to me anyway it wasn't. It was just a statement being made about the PS4 from Kero. Which what he said seemed fine. Your comment did kind of come off as if someone was talking negatively about the Switch. For instance if you had said yeah both would benefit from a price cut, instead of there is no point in mentioning one without the other then I think you would have got no misunderstandings. But I know you are a chill and cool poster so that's why I responded and asked.
It seems more like several other weeks when someone either complimented PS4 doing great on holidays (by not being that far behind and all) but someone needed to point out that Switch should be receiving props because it was selling incredible. When it was very much expected to do those great numbers, and praising one doesn't remove the other if don't praise it as well.
He and no one was giving excuses, they were stating a fact, for a 6 year with that price and so long without a cut PS4 is doing good. So your comment seemed like a strawman because no one was arguing anything regarding Switch or even using price as an excuse, it was just pointing out on what is expected and achieved.
Yeah I think wording is just important that's all. Stating one is doing great and speaking of what it could be doing with other factors is fine. No need to discuss all 3 with every post. But I understood his intentions with his response now that he has explained them.
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...