Dead Space, Super Mario, Sonic, Cuphead, Kojimas P.T. recreated in "Dreams"

[Chazore]

Faelco said:

Chazore said:

I meant in the way that devs use entire different engines. Dreams is presented like an empty canvas in which to paint on, while Engines like Unreal are not in their entirety, otherwise Dreams could make all games from now on, and be feature complete and even pave thew way for all games, but we know it's not wholly capable of surpassing the likes of other Engines and dev kit software. It's something, but that doesn't mean to say it's something to hold to the same level of praise as the latest tech or engines. 

See you see the glass as half full, I don't, that's the difference between how you and me see this. 

So you're an elitist, that's all. 

 

"Dreams does great things and is way more accessible than the other softwares, but it's not as complete as the professional ones so it's not praise-worthy". It's the complete opposite actually. Being able to do that much with an easier and more accessible tool IS praiseworthy.

MM did tremendous work to make game development easier for anyone, even if you won't develop GTA6 on it. 

No, not really. I just give praise to developed engines and software, that is factually greater than software designed to act like something akin to GIMP. 

Just because I don't see things your way, doesn't make me an "elitist". If anything that's a shallow way of trying to deal with the fact that I don't see things, nor agree with them your way. 

I dunno about accessible, not everyone will know how to use it, just like not everyone knows how to use UE, but there are a lot that seemingly know how to use RPG makers (hence why we see a load of RPG maker games these days). Why should I give more, if not the same praise for something that does half of what something else does better or more detailed?. Are you telling me to be like those kind of "special" parents that wants every kid to receive a medal, even for non wins or last place?.