John2290 said:
Nah. Tested on multiple 4k displays and 1080p screens. All post processing off where applicable. There is actually a feature on my mates 4k TV that helps rather than hinders but I get what your saying, there is 'smooth motion' on my LG and lord does it fuck up the motion on every pre set, add on some other post processing features and everything starts to rubber band in motion however I never leave these on all be it for one colour enhancing feature that works wonders with no visible negatives. Not the issue but I know exactly why you came to that reasoning. Three 4k TV's now and plenty of 1080p screens and it's all the same, 24fps just looks bad in some cases. Not all but most high action or fast movement scenes. Bright on Netflix looks awful for example. The frame by frame set up more noticable as the resolution increases also, the clarity makes the small little frame jumps just that much clearer to be annoyingly noticable and immersioncan be destroyed along with attention. Screen size obviously also plays a role but thankfully that can be offset by distance from the screen.
|
Does Netflix deliver 24p content correctly? Perhaps it adds 3:2 pulldown to show it as 60fps?
I recently watched Westworld S2 on blu-ray, which I'm pretty sure is filmed at 24fps (35mm film) and it looked great on my old plasma and new 4K HDR tv. They both have 24p modes, as well as the ps3 I still use to watch blu-ray. 35mm 24fps is still the best way to film.
Clarity does not make frame jumps more noticeable, brightness does however. (Unless you have so many motion artifacts from compression it's like the whole screen is motion blurred at lower resolutions). 35mm was plenty clear in the cinema and had less stutter than the same movies on VHS... It must be the display not showing it correctly.







