By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:

Good third party support = when any random third-party multi-platform game from a respected studio is announced you assume that it's for x platform and you're kinda surprised if it isn't. The Switch clearly doesn't have that.

Case in point: Bethesda (or at least Bethesda's) games are listed throughout this thread and others as an example of the Switch having "good third party support", but even then when Fallout 76 was announced, people generally didn't assume it was coming to Switch, and weren't surprised when it wasn't. Same thing goes for Ubisoft and Beyond Good and Evil 2. As good as Ubisoft has been about supporting the Switch, and I know that game is nowhere close to released, but is anyone gonna be scratching their head if it doesn't come to Switch? I doubt it. I bet the average gaming enthusiast would be more shocked if it doesn't appear on PS5 and that console doesn't even exist.

And no one will justify it not coming to PS5 with "but when the game started to be developed they didn't knew our system was going to release". Seems like Reggie never saw a release of a console with several games that were in development for like 4 years and only in the last year they had specs for the next gen system they ported it over.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."