By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
VAMatt said:

I don't see where anyone is treating it as anything other than what it is - a ranked list of the value (according to somebody) of various brands.  Beyond that, people are speculating about regional differences in relative value of various brands.  That seems to be exactly what the OP is about.  

I just read back over the thread and the replies I'm talking about are still there, so I'm not sure what you mean.  One poster literally mentions Nintendo ranking higher than Xbox and Playstation.  As far as the OP goes, it's talking about one thing and then linking to a list that's about something different.  I don't see why you'd have a problem with me pointing that out.

I see what you're saying now.    

Still, its just a discussion about the relative strength of gaming-related brands, in a forum.  This isn't a class on branding.  So, it doesn't have to be scientific.  It just has to make for interesting discussion.