| mZuzek said: Hell no, it's Nintendo. I'd take a price raise after they can prove they're gonna make the online better, not before it. At the moment the low price (paying $4 yearly on a shared family plan) is the only thing making this whole fiasco borderline acceptable. |
What would make the service more acceptable is if they had better offerings than NES games so something has to eventually give because slapping a low price tag means you getting a lower value in the end ...
Who wants to pay for no added functionality or very old games that are only available for a month ? With XLG and PS+ there is something in each that does better than the others. With XBL, a lot of Microsoft's own content offers online functionality but it gets better since they offer "backwards compatibility" games in their GwG program too and PS+ offers an amazing desirable selection of both high quality and valuable modern content all the while the Switch Online doesn't excel in anything ...
Heck, offering cloud games bi-monthly or at least per quarter would make the Switch Online a lot more attractive than it is now ...
