By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Louie said:
Zelda II is amazing and way better than people make it out to be. It only got its reputation as the black sheep in the series years after its release because it doesn't follow the "traditional" 2D Zelda formula. Blaster Master is great, too. But this month is still disappointing: Nintendo promised threegames per month and they can't even deliver that outside of Japan.

But I'll keep my hopes up. I still think the NES service is just Nintendo's playing ground for a real classic streaming service. I'd gladly pay 50 bucks a year for a solid collection of SNES, N64, Gamecube, Gameboy, Gameboy Color and Gameboy Advance games. It just makes too much financial sense to do it: They'd easily get over 10 million subscribers for such a service.

This! in fact I would say Zelda II is better than the following Zeldas at a minimum:

Spirit Tracks, Phantom Hourglass, Skyward Sword

, Wind Waker, A Link Between Worlds, Majora...probably Four Swords, too, but that is a tough comparison since Four Swords is multiplayer.  Of course Zelda II is toug to compare to most of the above games since it is a more intense platforming/ swordfigting experience

Two games still sucks, though, and it would also be best if Ninty started adding SNES games as not everyone wants their games NES hard.

Last edited by couchmonkey - on 10 January 2019