Biggerboat1 said:
Intrinsic said:
Well first off... you are right. My opinion could very well be misguided especially considering the extremist nature of my qualification.
But you will be wrong to assume that I am saying that because the NS is not in the home console business anymore it means I am saying they are in the handheld business. I am not, cause I don't think the NS is a handheld either.
I think its a hybrid.
Now as I have explained, while its a hybrid I feel it has more in common with a handheld than a hme console, I feel it was built from the round up as a handheld albeit one built for 2017 but it is by all means a hybrid.
Now that could explain why it sells for what it sells, that could be one of the home console thins it has inherited too. So the same way I will argue that nintend has pulled out of the traditional home console market is the same way I would argue that they have pulled out of the traditional handheld market. Its a hybrid.
|
Can't you see how silly that sounds though...
Nintendo employs the same people it did before Switch came out, makes the same games, sells to the same market - yet according to you they have pulled out of 1 business, are pulling out of another and have moved into a completely new business...
Does it not make more sense that that by creating a single hybrid they remain in both the handheld and home console markets?
Take the Surface Book - it's a hybrid - it's design allows it to be a tablet and a laptop, rather than precludes it from being either - which seems to be what you're saying...
|
They have repositioned themselves in the market. After the Wii U and 3ds it was badly needed.
