Pemalite said:
DonFerrari said:
Last shooter I played "for real" was CS 1.6, all other FPS I either don't do MP or just play the minimum (if it is low) for my platinum in series I like.
So really even 60fps is pointless for me outside of Gran Turismo and fighting games. I can understand it being desirable by a small group of PC gamer, but considering console gaming have always put more of the budget on graphics and aiming 30 fps (outside of e-sport games and the like) I don't think anyone will really aim 120fps next-gen. Perhaps we may start to care about 60fps in more genres (I doubt) but before we do it, 120fps is outside of question.
|
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying 120fps is coming to consoles anytime soon, it really isn't in any meaningful way, the primary display consoles use are Televisions, which generally are 60hz panels anyway. (Or use some kind of frame interpolation to fake higher rates. It's nasty.)
60fps though I think should be the minimum anyway, games just feel and looker smoother to play when they have the proper frame pacing.
|
Pemalite is right. Most HDTVs (Even 4K) only actually support 60Hz refresh rates. It makes no sense to support a feature that the vast majority of the user base won't be able to use without buying a higher end TV.
