By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jlauro on 23 June 2008
Edit Thread
NJ5 said:
jlauro said:
The article is not that negative. It's not likely to change the opinion of those who already frequent the site, and as they say any publicity is good publicity.

You could also say, there is only one thing worse than being talked about and that is NOT being talked about.

It's not that negative? At least at some points, it's quite explicitly saying that VGChartz gets no data from retailers. That would mean this site is a sham.

How is that not being negative?

 

 

Sorry, I must of missed that part?  I seen where it say it includes "Sampled direct sell-through data" among other things.