By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immersiveunreality on 26 December 2018
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
Immersiveunreality said:

But you use racial discrimination considering the N word because you think the word is racist in itself if it is spoken by a white person  that knows it meaning with different political views than you, you speak of intend and context yet you do not need it whenever a white person speaks the doomed word so yeah you discriminate a whole skincolour in this case.

Looks like I'll have to post these for the 4th time.  Do you guys even read?

"That said, of course it can used by white people under a set of given circumstances.  For social research, historical re-enactments, art,....again, context is crucial.  I keep saying that. "

"Who he called a N-word is irrelevant. It's the underlying connotation of the word itself. The word is a term of disparagement of the black race. Period. When used by the race that brought it into the English lexicon knowing and being fully aware of its function, history, relevancy, context...you then are ignoring the pejorative nature of the word and it is that willful ignorance that does not absolve you from being called racist.

To sum up....you know it's wrong and you do it anyway = racist."

Oh yes we read and we fully disagree that knowing the meaning of the word makes you racist even when its use is not intented to be racist,to you the spoken intend is tied to the definition of the word in a very extreme way and no not everyone thinks so black or white.

You can call people dumb or rude for the way that sargon was using it but not racist,and you can react to this with trying to be condescending for a 5th time but it does not make you right and do not expect us to follow this same onesided track you are on .

Last edited by Immersiveunreality - on 26 December 2018