Why a Joy-Con-less Switch model is a terrible idea

[Pyro as Bill]

TheMisterManGuy said:

Pyro as Bill said:
Historically, handheld gamers don't need local multiplayer (same system) or motion controls (full movement not tilt).

The $300 pricetag is a bargain for those people who are open to buying a Nintendo home console and handheld.
It's reasonable for those who want a home console with solid gimmick however it's still expensive for the traditional HH gamer.
So long as a joycon-less Switch is still compatible with a dock and joycons, it isn't an issue. They rightfully get a HH-only Switch for a lower price but can still get the full experience if they buy dock/joycons.

Thing is, a Switch bundle without the dock would do a way better job at serving that role. It'd be a great way to sell a second Switch to families who already have one, as well as consumers who want a purely portable experience, while still retaining the core concept of the Switch itself, that way even those who only play undocked are still guaranteed to have all the playstyles needed ready. 

Japan's already doing it. It isn't doing a better job than the HH-Switch is going to do.