Mr Puggsly said:
To hit 1080p/60 fps on PS4 or X1, a game really needs to be built around that. Some people think that means UE4 is out of the question, but it really just depends on the graphics, assets, etc. I mean Gears 4 could have been a 1080p/60 fps and still have graphics better than 7th gen Gears games. But they raised the graphics so high, doing 1080p/60 fps isn't possible with the base GPU. For a game like Ark, even with the best optimization, 1080p and 60 fps is off the table because its an open world game, tons of foliage, demanding effects, etc. I can't really think of games really pushing 1080p and/or 60 fps with Ark's presentation with an open world on top of that. In theory the X1X is better capable of doing that, still wouldn't have an amazing resolution though. |
God of War, HZD and RDR2 would probably do it if they were aiming at the level of IQ of Ark. As was pretty much posted several times, Ark is a very badly optimized.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."