couchmonkey said:
Maybe..but what better answer is there? "too demanding for our hardware" would have trolls dancing in the streets. At least this way, Reggie has us arguing over whether it is possible and whether Rockstar would even want to try. He could blame Rockstar (probably a bad idea) or he could promise it will be there later (okay, but now what?) or he could take it down a peg (we'll leave boring cowboy simulators for the other consoles). I like the last option best but it might be just as bad as insulting Rockstar directly, for company relations. I am open to other answers that would make Nintendo Switch look good without hurting Rockstar. Edit: forget boring, how about, "CASUAL cowboy simulator"? |
He could have said that even though he thinks the game is great, R* had priorities that didn't include porting the game to Switch.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
