Mnementh said:
Actually I don't think there should be made a big distinction between exclusive and non-exclusive. Games are games. So we should celebrate the rise of the gaming library on Switch. Be it Katamari Damacy or Civilization VI, Valkyria Chronicles or Smash Ultimate. They all enrich the platform. And that the Switch gets more and more games is something to celebrate.
Agreed. While Swithc got already some good turn-based RPGs, we still need more of that. I am hopeful for SMT V, possible Etrian Odyssey or Bravely Default, Digimon, maybe some Devil Survivor or similar as well. maybe also something western, in the vein of Child of Light. And hopefully a lot of more games, because turn-based RPGs are just superior.
I partly agree. I mostly think exclusives are bad, and agree it should be a thing of the first parties. But sometimes there are reasons for third-party exclusives I can accept. A first-party financed a game which wouldn't have happened otherwise. The userbase of one platform is so specific, the game probably has only there success. Specific features of the platform that are used. Also you shouldn't forget, there are more than three platforms. PC and mobile are viable gaming platforms as well. And I am happy Switch gets games from there as well, as Civilization VI or Ion Maiden (it gets to other console platforms as well, but the point is, it originated as a PC game) and mobile stuff like Fallout Shelter or Elder Scrolls Legends.
So what? Fans of niche genres aren't worthy and should stop playing?
As I said above, for some games it makes sense, for financial or technical reasons. But for the most part games should reach every platform possible. for instance: I think Firaxis is stupid for not putting Civ VI on PS4 and XB1. Yes, they say something about controls, but the classic controls they cooked up for Switch are just fine, I never even played it with the touch screen. That would work without any problem on the other platforms. |
Critically acclaimed games + below average sales doesn't pay the bills (especially as gaming costs rise). I would like to see critically acclaimed series continue and if being exclusive hinders its ability to sell then it'll make sense to make the game non exclusive.







